Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Those Arrests

It seems that the arrests made in Melbourne and Sydney (no link, but it's all over the place) were made under the existing provisions of the anti-terror laws operating in this country.

What better evidence is there than this that the laws in existence are perfectly adequate in achieving the goal of preventing terror attacks? Guilty or not, these people were arrested perfectly legitimately under existing provisions.

Why, therefore, do we need to go nuts and add to such provisions??


Post a Comment

<< Home